Skip to content
P Permafrost Pedia Survival · Cold · Biomes
Menu
Short answer: a cautious yes if you play solo or in a duo and want an atmospheric survival game you can sink a story into; wait if what you want is stable, well-designed four-player co-op, or a technically smooth experience on day one. It costs $19.99 / €19.99 and will stay in Early Access for at least twelve months — there is no content cliff coming, only patches.

The state of the reviews

Permafrost entered Early Access on 9 October 2026 and sits at “Mostly Positive” on Steam — roughly 71–72% of some 850–930 reviews as of 13–14 October. Independent coverage is in the same band: a 30-hour solo review from Fix Gaming Channel scored it 7/10, and other outlets praised the premise while withholding a final verdict until deeper into Early Access. Nothing in week one suggests the Steam score is being carried by hype — the complaints are specific and repeated across independent sources.

What players consistently praise

  • The cold earns its place as the antagonist. Reviewers report serious temperature pressure within the first twenty minutes — the survival tension starts immediately instead of after three comfortable hours.
  • Progression through exploration, not skill trees. You advance by going somewhere — restoring shelters, repairing machines, reclaiming technology. Multiple players call this the game’s best quality.
  • Storms as events. The rest mechanic makes weather worth sitting out: eat, rest, let the blizzard pass. It turns the environment into a rhythm rather than a background.
  • The systems read without a manual, and the first real campfire feels like an achievement — the small-victory loop survival games live or die by.

The three real complaints

1. Co-op is the weakest pillar

This is the most serious one, because four-player survival is on the store page. Multiple independent reviews report the same design flaw: the quest progresses for everyone regardless of who does it — one player’s summary went viral for a reason: his friend could go AFK while he finished the questline alone. Add shared loot and reports that only the host gets the dog, and the co-op loop currently undersells its own pitch. Launch patches improved invites and co-op stability, but this complaint is about design, not bugs, and the studio has not called it a bug.

2. The technical state is a lottery

Reports are near-perfectly contradictory: some players crash three or four times on world creation or black-screen before the menu; others play 4K at high frame rates with zero incidents. When the same build is flawless for one machine and broken for the next, that is configuration-and-driver territory — which also means it is largely patchable. Two official patches landed in the first three days, and our fix guide collects what actually works. If you buy now, buy knowing you may spend an evening on workarounds first.

3. Rough edges in animation, AI and voicing

Animal AI is routinely described as dim — one reviewer’s formulation: lower than their body temperature. The dog gets stuck on stairs. Voice acting is serviceable at best, and the story’s logic takes hits from reviewers. One recurring player comparison stings precisely because of the publisher: Permafrost is published by Toplitz Productions, of the Dynasty series, and some players read it as a “winter Medieval Dynasty reskin” rather than the minimalist dread of The Long Dark. That is a player impression, not our verdict — but if The Long Dark is your benchmark, calibrate before buying.

Who should buy now

  • You want a story-driven survival game for solo or two players, and the cold-as-antagonist premise sells you.
  • You have tolerance for Early Access friction and a willingness to apply workarounds.
  • You like watching a game get better month over month — the roadmap plans biomes, quests, NPCs, equipment and vehicles across a 12+ month window.

Who should wait

  • Your whole plan is a dedicated four-player campaign — wait for the co-op quest design to be addressed, not just patched around.
  • You are on hardware near the minimum requirements, or a configuration (laptop hybrid graphics, older DX12 drivers) that launch week flagged as crash-prone.
  • You expect 1.0 polish for 1.0-style money; the honest framing is that you are buying a good foundation with a construction site around it.

The refund question

Steam’s standard refund policy applies: within 14 days of purchase and under two hours of playtime, refundable by request. Launch week’s crash-on-world-creation reports mean some players used it; the two official patches since have visibly narrowed that group. The pragmatic play, if you are on the fence: buy early in a session you can refund inside two hours — enough to get through world creation, the opening, and a first night.

For the technical side of that first night, start with our first-night routine; for current bugs before you buy, read the known issues tracker and the review roundup.

Sources: Steam customer reviews (sample and score as of 13–14 October 2026), Fix Gaming Channel’s 30-hour Early Access review, InsertCoins’ launch review, and player reports aggregated across launch week — all secondary coverage, linked from our review roundup. Player quotes are attributed impressions, not our measurements.

Data version 2026.10.12 · reviewed 12 October 2026. Compiled 14 October 2026, five days after Early Access opened. Scores move fast in week one — check the linked roundup for the current state before deciding.

Continue reading